Friday, March 19, 2010

Cops Say Citizen Oversight Won’t Work Part 6

Why It Won't Work Part 5

Why It Won't Work Part 4

Why It Won't Work Part 3

Why It Won't Work Part 2

Why It Won't Work Part 1


#6--Citizens will try to control all aspects of the PD


Another piece of evidence that cops are paranoid and have PLENTY to hide.

There is no cop out there who understands what the citizen wants in a police department because they have always had the mindset of working for themselves with no regard for any citizen preference. For cops, the job is and always will be Us Versus Them. That is the arrogance the Academy looks for and nurtures, leading to every cop thinking that way.


Nobody who is living a public life, AND PAID TO DO IT WITH PUBLIC FUNDS, has anything to fear by being audited, expedited, reviewed or critiqued by that same public, right? Somehow, cops disagree, and the smell of suspicion seeps in……


Another Hypocrisy

There is a subtext here that should not be missed. Cops don’t want their “professional privacy” invaded. (They say it would degrade the quality of their work.) Cops know they are another public utility, like water and sewer, but still want to play the privacy card during work hours or anything else work related, which they interpret as 24/7. This is much more than just hypocrisy. It is screaming ego.


There is an old joke about a high profile night club that is very, very exclusive. In fact, it is so exclusive, absolutely nobody knows where the club is and no one has ever been there. That night club is the cop’s business model. We should all hear and know of police, and hear about how fantastic they are, but not know anything about who they are or how they do things. While such a goal is an out-of-reach ultimate, cops drool over the possibility of being that anonymous. The freedom to do and say anything to anybody and never see a repercussion is what all PDs aspire to. Oh, and get paid. And be called a hero. What a Nirvana. What a Xanadu. What an unrealistic thought.


We Didn’t Want The Job, So We Hired People

This cop-created criticism of a CRB is the one that comes closest to reality, in that when a CRB finds a problem, they will repair or replace it with a method that reflects the citizen’s needs. But to operate every aspect of the PD is not what a taxpayer is interested in doing, any more than operating the water or sewer facilities. The citizen hires police to do that work FOR us, and cops don’t seem to get it. They forget who the real boss is. Arrogance will do that to a fellow.


As stated before, the people invented the police. We invited cops into our communities to do a particular job FOR us, and we offered a fair compensation for their work. We do not hire and pay a workforce, only to do the job ourselves. We expect and demand the paid employees to deliver. We also, however, expect the job to be performed to our satisfaction, and that occasionally includes an explanation to an employee the specifics of their failings. As with any other job, they must measure up or ship out. That bears repeating---as with any other job.


Reviewing and repairing police failure doesn’t constitute the nit-picking, arbitrary method police departments try to predict with their warning that a CRB will try to run all aspects of a PD. We have no interest in doing such a thing, which is why we issue paychecks to the police. Cops just don’t get it.


Clarity On Both Sides Is Needed

What we never offered our cops is jurisdiction over all citizens whenever and however they find them, regardless of what citizens want. We the People are the deciders of who gets arrested locally, who gets ticketed, or searched, or pretext stopped, or detained, or anything else at the local level, including how a citizen is spoken to by a police employee. We can and are supposed to tell our cops how to act, but we don’t. The result is the child telling the parent how to run the household. The animals are running the zoo. We Citizens don’t do our jobs.


The Citizen Review Board is the only solution to what has gotten completely out of control. I do not mean some figurehead style entity that meets now and then just to vote on when their next meeting will be, and then go home. I don’t mean a body that will decide what the people want and submit it to the police chief, only to have their recommendations instantly and permanently ignored. And I definitely DO NOT mean a board of people who still feel they must take orders from cops or police unions. A Hire & Fire CRB is the only one with any real authority, and after convincing the citizen of that, the police department will have no choice but to fall into line.


Folks, police departments around the country are playing us for fools. Cops know that without Hire & Fire, no CRB can do anything constructive. Forming a CRB without Hire & Fire is like installing a fire hydrant without water. All cops need to do is toss in an irrelevant “objection” here and there to prolong the debate, complain to the Mayor, and claim the CRB only wants to fire everybody, they don’t understand intricate police work, they already have one within the PD. Yadda Yadda. A successful and working CRB isn’t one that debates with cops, it is one that sculpts a police department.


Let’s Settle This

Cops will never understand that it isn’t about what they think, it is about what the citizen wants. Unless a Citizen Review Board attracts and fosters a whole new breed of law enforcement, we will be fed a never ending diet of twisted police garbage thinking, and told it makes perfect sense, even if we can’t understand it. We must do our own hiring.


Any sense makes good sense if citizens agree to it, at least for their town, or state, or country. That’s why we have voting as a deciding mechanism. But when we are told something makes sense that doesn’t make ANY sense to us, it is tantamount to treason. Today’s cops don’t understand they serve at our pleasure, not their own. We must do our own firing.


Demand a Citizen Review Board with Hire & Fire in your city or town today, and don’t rest until your police force is brought into line.

Saturday, March 6, 2010

Cops Say Citizen Oversight Won't Work Part 5


Why It Won't Work Part 4

Why It Won't Work Part 3

Why It Won't Work Part 2

Why It Won't Work Part 1



#5-All Board Members Will Have An Axe To Grind With The PD.


We have all heard it before----every jail in the country is full of innocent people. Don’t believe it? Just ask them. Well, before we laugh ourselves silly, I have one name to mention. Barry Scheck. But shall we proceed?


There Is No Axe In Sight

To think that everybody has a personal axe to grind with the police is to say nobody wants a police department and that subject has already been covered on this blog. If you missed it, I’ll sum it up: Wrong. We citizens thought up the concept of a local police department. We are willing to fork over the cash to finance it. Now all of a sudden, we don’t want police? Let’s get some realism.


The only way a citizen could come close to having an axe to grind is if he has been obviously abused, mistreated, or worse, lied about by a cop. Even the least educated among us has been known to quote the words “innocent until proven guilty”. If a citizen has been treated in a way that violates that ethic, they don’t like it. The wound goes very, very deep.


Police, hear this----Before there were cops, there was a desire for justice, and all of us know it. You’re existence is the RESULT of that desire, and your paychecks are the proof of it. We don’t hate police, we hate inappropriate and destructive workmanship, like every other employer in the world.

No axe there.


Even in an extreme case, the abused citizen only has interest in the specific cop who cheated him out of his rights and justice. It only spreads beyond that if the citizen is ignored and the bad cop is believed by IA and the Chief and continues to collect more victims. At that point, we start to think in terms of corruption, but not axes.


Corrupt Cops See The Fictitious Axe

Corruption is a systemic problem that only a Citizen Review Board can address. It is understandable by anyone, and does not take on the personal attribute required to wield an axe. As an analogy, we know the difference between getting a bad meal at a restaurant and thinking the chef is “out to get us”. Cops, however, seem more prone to the reversed and paranoid pattern of thinking. Why is this? Guilty conscience? Yes.

Having suspicion or proof of corruption is the genesis for axe grinding against any PD. It is the point where all faith is lost and the worst becomes the expected. Cop, ask yourself, what would make that happen?

Cops who lie, cheat, steal, murder, extort, rape, blackmail, and so on? (Just read the papers; it’s all there.)

THAT’S what causes anyone to grind his axe. If a cop ever wonders where a particular citizen gets it, he can just look in the mirror for the explanation.


Once Again, The CRB To The Rescue

But wait! We are talking a Citizen Review Board here, not a guy who may have a case to bring. No oversight board is made up of one person or decision maker. Citizens who serve on any CRB have only one thing on their minds, and that is getting the PD of their choice, a group decision, determined by public vote. No oversight panel is there to sentence every cop to eternal damnation. They know what isn’t proper cop material and behavior according to their wishes for their city, and they are there to accomplish that. With hire & fire, the sculpting would take effect for more accurate police department service. There is no axe to grind in a functioning CRB with teeth, just progress toward public satisfaction and appreciation of police work as performed. Both sides win, because they are finally on the same page.


(Hey….could it be…..that a cop has an axe to grind against anyone who wants a CRB? No, no, never mind. They are sworn and dedicated to the job of working for ALL of us, right?)


Cops, don’t worry, just do what we want you to do, and all will be fine.


Why It Won't Work Part 4

Why It Won't Work Part 3

Why It Won't Work Part 2

Why It Won't Work Part 1



Thursday, March 4, 2010

Cops Say Citizen Oversight Won't Work Part 4

Why It Won't Work Part 5

Why It Won't Work Part 3

Why It Won't Work Part 2

Why It Won't Work Part 1


#4-A Review Board Will Just Fire Everybody, Leaving Us All Totally Unprotected.



The Fallacy

Well, we have to go back to the Academy’s attitude training again. Part of the brainwashing new recruits get daily says “Your city is DEPENDING on you. The dimwit citizens are helpless against the sophisticated 21st century criminals at work out there. You…..Officer, must risk your life and limb to save the helpless and restore order to a city on the verge of chaos. You…..are…..their….Savior!”


OK, ok, ok…..take a breath for a second. The only criminals that rise to the level being alluded to are in comic books, and the only people ready to stop arch-criminals like that are your Batmans, your Supermans, your Aquamans, (in the unlikely event that your fishtank is threatened). Let’s go back to the real world, police departments.


The Reality

Societies have always had their legal and moral B-lists, those who don’t see the financial advantages of an honest day’s work, or the moral advantages of live and let live. While a free society grants and encourages freedom of thought and movement, that same society doesn’t condone physical harm or destruction of property. This is a universal understanding among all people in all societies. So tell me cops…any cops….CALLING ALL COPS….please explain why the citizen’s review board would fire all police? No sense being made there…..


The Details

Many cops bolster their own existence and that of their fellows by constantly pushing the “without us you will all die” point of view, something out of the Republican-created, Fox News-fueled rulebook. It’s a self serving, self preserving idea, meant to keep the cop in business. While always ready for another helping of company kool-aid, they tend to underestimate their audience and over-sell their product.


A cop will say, “The citizen must accept any misconduct the police department decides to engage in, because it’s done for their own good. It is all in the name of justice.” On the surface, such a decision-making platform sounds like something a citizen would reject due to the strong probability of corruption, but no organized oversight group would respond in such a knee-jerk manner, when the oversight board’s first obligation is truly with the citizenry. Such determinations of police misconduct would be made by the people and for the people, as represented by a functioning CRB with teeth. We would require cops to become sensitive and obedient to our needs, as we are of theirs.


The Cop’s Misconception

Cops are trained to provide each other with backup and cross backup while in the field, to the point of redundancy, and it is one of the few strategies cops employ that actually deserves applause. Protecting our own is a concept we all understand, but do cops think they are the only intellects that can conceive such a plan? Well, here’s a bulletin, police---a CRB is no stranger to it. We will do just fine. The PD need only worry about providing the services the citizen demands, and in the form they demand it. We will not let our police force run dry just because some cops don’t make the cut. As this blog has advocated from the first day, we don’t hire a PD, we sculpt one. It is a stepwise process. There will be successes and failures among cops, but it will be the citizen who determines them.


Are there people who don’t like cops? Sure. Are there people who don’t need cops? No way. That is why we created police departments, and we pay them for their work. However, we did not hire a bunch of independent contractors to formulate a job of their choice, after their own image, and then perpetrate it on the very people who pay them. The citizens have allowed the PD to acquire more than 51% of the stock, and now the PD is abusing it. That must stop.


The Remedy

Civilian oversight authority to hire and fire will assure us that only employees of whom we approve will continue to represent the wants, needs, and reputation of the town in which they work. How do we make that happen? Sculpting.


Every incorporated city and town has a PD now. Some consist of a Chief and a canine, (not a bad idea). Others are a bloated, out-of-control mess of thousands of employees who don’t have a clue what their city wants. Those cops are paycheck-seeking, mindless misfits who believe that if they don’t beat/shoot/tase people, they are not taken seriously, if they don’t write tickets, they are letting criminality slip through their fingers, and if they don’t “win” court cases, they “lose” in the public’s eye. In Detroit, there is a minimum performance level for their cops, as spelled out by Chief Warren Evans.


This mindset must be purged. The last thing any city needs is a reactionary cop response to members of society, armed only with their ability to read, write and comprehend, who are looking to uphold their rights against a PD who has been given a free right to kill based on his unfounded, split-second assumption.


Don’t Panic

Even when the citizen is up against such a sanctioned and tax-funded person in uniform, it STILL doesn’t mean a CRB would fire everybody. It only means it would get rid of the unwanted, and keep/train/develop the wanted, as it is with every other job the citizens hold.


If a PD Chief says a CRB would fire everybody, he is revealing a guilty conscience and his own fear of unemployment. He knows he is failing to quell crime in his city, and he thinks a high number of tickets and arrests equal doing a good job. While neither makes for the quality police work the citizen envisioned when their PD was started, the currently practiced inefficiency and disconnect with local townspeople will not get the whole department fired either. It will only sculpt each cop into a product the citizen wants, thanks to a Citizen Review Board.


Cops…calm down. Just do the job we want you to do and there will be no problem.


Why It Won't Work Part 5

Why It Won't Work Part 3

Why It Won't Work Part 2

Why It Won't Work Part 1